RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-03219
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
Her Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code of 4C (Separated for
concealment of juvenile records, minority, failure to meet
physical standard for enlistment, failure to attain a 9.0
reading grade level as measured by the Air Force Reading
Abilities Test, or void enlistments) be changed to allow reentry
in the military.
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
She was assured that she would be able to re-enlist with the
code that she was given. When she tried to re-enlist she was
told that she couldnt with her current RE code.
The applicants complete submission, with attachments, is at
Exhibit A.
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant initially entered the Regular Air Force on
12 Nov 13.
On 23 Dec 13, the applicants commander notified her that he was
recommending her for discharge for erroneous enlistment. The
reason for this action was a medical narrative summary, dated
16 Dec 13, that found the applicant did not meet minimum medical
standards to enlist; specifically, that the applicant had limb
pain.
On 23 Dec 13, the applicant acknowledged receipt of the action
and waived her rights to consult with legal counsel or submit
statements on her own behalf.
On 31 Dec 13, the action was found to be legally sufficient and,
on 6 Jan 14, the discharge authority concurred with the
commanders recommendation.
On 6 Jan 14, the applicant was furnished an entry level
separation, with uncharacterized service, with a RE code of 4C.
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are
contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of
primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C.
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial of the applicants request for an
RE code that would make her eligible to reenlist. The applicant
was involuntarily discharged for Failed Medical/Physical
Procurement Standards after serving 1 month and 25 days of
service. She received an erroneous RE code on her DD Form 214,
Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, of 4C.
Her correct RE code is 2C (Involuntarily separated with an
honorable discharge; or entry level separation without
characterization of service) as required by AFI 36-2606,
Reenlistments in the USAF, based on her entry level separation
with uncharacterized service. The RE code 2C is required based
on the entry level separation with uncharacterized service and
the applicant does not provide any evidence of an error or
injustice to support a reenlistment eligible RE code. Unless
otherwise directed by the Board, AFPC/DPSOY will provide the
applicant a corrected copy of her DD Form 214 with an RE code of
2C.
A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit C.
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the
applicant on 17 Nov 14 for review and comment within 30 days
(Exhibit D). As of this date, no response has been received by
this office.
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by
existing law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice warranting
correcting the applicants records to make her immediately
eligible for reenlistment. We took notice of the applicant's
complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however,
we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force
office of primary responsibility (OPR) and adopt its rationale
as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the
victim of an injustice with respect to her eligibility for
enlistment. We note the Air Force OPR has determined the
applicant should have been issued an RE code of 2C in
conjunction with her entry-level separation with uncharacterized
service and will correct her records administratively.
Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find
no basis to recommend granting relief beyond that rendered
administratively.
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this
application.
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2014-03219 in Executive Session on 22 Apr 15, under
the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 30 Jul 14, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Memorandum, AFPC/DPSOA, dated 8 Sep 14.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 17 Nov 14.
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01503
The reason for this action was a medical narrative summary, dated 15 Nov 13, that found the applicant did not meet minimum medical standards to enlist; specifically, that the applicant had anemia. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AETC/SGPS recommends denial as it pertains to the applicants medical diagnosis,...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04255
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letters prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility (OPR), which are attached at Exhibits C, D, and E. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AETC/SGPS recommends denial of the applicants request to change his RE code to reflect eligibility for reenlistment, medical discharge, or medical separation, indicating there is no evidence of an error or an...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03614
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-03614 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reentry (RE) code of 4C (Separated for concealment of juvenile records, minority, failure to meet physical standards for enlistment, failure to attain a 9.0 reading grade level as measured by the Air Force Reading Abilities Test, or...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02975
________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicants military personnel records indicate he enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 03 Feb 09. Airmen are given entry-level separation with uncharacterized service when separation is initiated within the first 180 days of continuous active service. While the applicants military personnel records indicate that he was erroneously issued an RE code of 4C, his correct RE code should be...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-04753
The complete SGPS evaluation is at Exhibit D. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant on 6 May 2011, for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit E). However, a recent medical evaluation submitted by the applicant indicates she does not present symptoms or reaction to bananas. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04109
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04109 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reentry (RE) code of 4C (failure to meet physical standards for enlistment) be changed to a code that will allow him to reenlist in the military. ________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicants...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03496
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-03496 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her reentry (RE) code of 4C (Separated for concealment of juvenile records, minority, failure to meet physical standards for enlistment, failure to attain a 9.0 reading grade level as measured by the Air Force Reading Abilities Test, or...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01078
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-01078 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her reentry (RE) code of 2C (involuntarily separated with a honorable discharge; or entry level separation without characterization of service) be changed to a 4C RE Code (separated for concealment of juvenile records, minority, failure to meet...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01441
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-01441 COUNSEL: HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her uncharacterized entry level separation, separation code of JFW which denotes failed medical/physical procurement standards, and reentry (RE) code of 4C (separated for concealment of juvenile records, minority, failure to meet physical standards for...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05611
On 22 Nov 13, after serving four months and seven days, the applicant was furnished an ELS with uncharacterized service, and issued an RE Code of 2C and Narrative Reason for Separation of Entry Level Performance or Conduct. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicants military records, are described in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is included at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE...